🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be cut by over 50%, following a controversial law change that required local governments to put the future of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple elected officials depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it aims to end “race-based” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create other types of electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that voted to keep their wards.