🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that authorities grant or withhold at their discretion. This represents the implication of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location demonstrations can take place, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "significant and unjustified restrictions" on civil liberties. Collectively, these incremental attacks on liberty have practically eliminated the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Rationalize Suppression

The latest limitations are being defended by referring to last week's terrible antisemitic assault on a Manchester mosque. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a pretext to stifle dissent is not only disconnected to that duty but perverts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at mass killing, you probably cannot draw the line at democratic principles," observed a prominent American author, whose words that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were branded as radicals in their era, even while they were advocating the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's truly happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have characterized as genocide. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

Western public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens believe Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and back the detention of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a despicable antisemitic crime to attempt to suppress a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government seems involved in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to continue.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also harmful. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a point where police authorities can suggest that demonstrations criticizing Israel's actions should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British political leaders and media outlets have barely concealed the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of racism in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a concerning boundary by banning a specific activist group, a non-violent, anti-genocide activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for holding placards against mass killing and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president characterized such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and died to establish our freedoms. We may eventually regret how casually we allowed them to slip away.